comparação needlz.ai
Needlz AI vs Temso AI — the detailed comparison (2026)
Atualizado em July 29, 2026 — competitor pricing verified against each vendor's official pricing page.
New neighbors, and good ones. Temso is one of the sharpest newer entrants in AI search optimization — their AI-traffic analytics and site-audit engine are clever engineering, and their G2 rating speaks for itself. Comparison pages are how buyers research (the SEO/GEO game — we both play it; that's rather the point). Temso team: zero snark, let's swap notes. ☕
The one-line difference
Temso optimizes your owned ground — your website. Needlz wins the earned ground — the conversations AIs cite — at a third of their price.
| Feature | Needlz | Temso AI |
|---|---|---|
| AI-answer visibility tracking | ✅ 4 engines (ChatGPT · Google · Gemini · Claude) | ✅ multi-model prompts |
| Per-engine coverage breakdown | ✅ | ✅ |
| Share of Voice vs named competitors | ✅ | — |
| Position in the answer (#1, #2…) | ✅ | — |
| Sentiment scoring | ✅ with the actual quotes | partial |
| Sentiment vs competitors | ✅ | — |
| Funnel-stage citation analysis | ✅ proprietary (FCI) | — |
| Market maps (visibility × sentiment · voice × position) | ✅ | — |
| Source-type breakdown (community/editorial/vendor…) | ✅ | — |
| Per-question source drill-down | ✅ | — |
| Cited content-format analysis | ✅ | — |
| Crawlability / AI-readiness check | ✅ 10 checks + fix-list | ✅ at 10k–1M-page volume |
| Citation movement ledger (gained/lost + defend links) | ✅ | — |
| Finds the live threads shaping answers | ✅ the core | — |
| Human-approved drafted replies, disclosure built in | ✅ the core | — |
| Funnel-tagged, lane-sorted thread feed | ✅ | — |
| Branded PDF reports | ✅ | ✅ |
| Editable pivot table + CSV export | ✅ | — |
| Multi-brand workspaces | ✅ Agency tier | ✅ |
| Multi-market (country + language) | ✅ incl. drafting in-language | — |
| AI bot-visit analytics on your own site | — | ✅ their standout |
| API / Looker / MCP integrations | — | ✅ thoughtful for technical teams |
| Starting price | $29/mo | $89/mo |
What Temso does brilliantly
- AI bot-visit analytics — productizing which AI crawlers read which of your pages is genuinely clever, and nobody does it this cleanly.
- Page auditing at serious volume; MCP access and API/Looker integrations for technical teams.
Everything needlz gives you — in detail
1 · The Index Board — your whole AI presence on one screen
Seven indexes, each with a plain-language ⓘ explainer and a click-through to its page:
- Visibility Index (0–100) — the share of your buyer questions where you're in the AI's answer.
- AI Coverage — your score on each engine: ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Gemini, Claude.
- Share of Voice — your slice of all brand mentions across you + your named competitors.
- Sentiment Index — how positively the answers describe you, where you appear.
- Position — when AIs list brands in your category, which place you typically get (#1, #2…).
- Funnel Citation Index — our proprietary score: citation coverage of the buying journey, weighted toward buyers closest to choosing.
- Crawlability Index — can the AI crawlers even read your own website? Ten checks, one score, a fix per miss. vs Temso: similar measuring ambitions — ours adds position, funnel, and sentiment-with-receipts, and every tile ends in an action.
2 · Threads — the earning engine (this is the heart of needlz)
Every scan surfaces the live Reddit and Quora conversations that shape AI answers in your category, sorted into lanes: already cited (defend it) · winnable (a rival's in, you're not) · choosing-a-tool asks · rival's unhappy customers. Each thread shows the buyer question that surfaced it, why it's here, and its stage in the buying funnel. vs Temso: the community/earned layer has no Temso equivalent — it's the other half of the game.
3 · Human-approved drafts in your voice — never auto-posted
For each thread, needlz drafts a reply that uses your real differentiators and founder story, with disclosure built in ("founder here…"). A human — you — reviews, edits, and posts. Safe-pace limits keep you a good community citizen. We think this is the only honest way to do this, and we've written it into our public transparency pledge.
4 · The Funnel — who owns the buying journey
Every buyer question maps to a stage — Learning → Shortlisting → Comparing → Validating → Switching — and you see, stage by stage, whether the AI answers cite you or a rival, with a 🎯 on the stage a competitor owns and the exact threads to win it back. vs Temso: needlz-only.
5 · Sources — where the narrative is shaped, down to each question
Which kinds of sources feed your category's answers (community / editorial / vendor / reference), which formats get cited, the top sources with your presence on each — and a per-question drill-down: pick any buyer question and see the exact pages the AI reads to build that answer, with your move on each. vs Temso: they analyze your site exhaustively; we analyze the external sources feeding the answers — complementary lenses.
6 · Sentiment — with receipts
Not just a score: the actual sentence each AI wrote about you, per question, per engine — and every negative or neutral read links to the thread shaping it, so sentiment becomes a to-do list, not a worry.
7 · Trends — the race, drawn
Your visibility curve against your rivals', sentiment and funnel curves, and the citation movement ledger: every citation gained or lost, dated, with "defend this thread →" on losses.
8 · Reports — shareable, and yours to shape
One-click branded PDF of everything, a pivot table you can reshape (brand × engine × funnel stage × question × source kind) and export to CSV or PDF, and a monthly archive that tells your visibility story.
9 · Multi-market, multi-language
Track markets separately (country + language), with drafting that writes in the market's language — Portuguese included. One dashboard for your home market and your expansion.
💰 Pricing — where the comparison gets uncomfortable (for our accountant)
We'll be direct: price is our biggest advantage, and it's deliberate. Needlz is built founder-sized — lean team, no enterprise sales machine, self-serve — so the price can be too.
| Needlz Founder | Needlz Agency | Temso AI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly | $29/mo | from $79/mo (+$49/mo per additional brand) | $89 / $199 / $499 per month |
| Per year | $348 | from $948 | $1,068 – $5,988 |
What $29 and $79 actually buy — the full needlz package
No feature-gating games: both plans get the entire product — all seven indexes, the funnel, sources, sentiment-with-receipts, trends, reports, and the thread-earning engine. The tiers only scale the quantities:
| What's in the box | Founder — $29/mo | Agency — from $79/mo |
|---|---|---|
| Price per year | $348 | from $948 (+$49/mo per extra brand) |
| Brands tracked | 1 | unlimited (each extra brand +$49/mo) |
| Buyer questions measured | 25 | 50 per brand |
| AI engines measured | 3 — ChatGPT · Google AI Overviews · Gemini | 4 — adds Perplexity |
| Per-engine breakdown | ✅ every index, per engine | ✅ |
| Markets (country + language) | 1 | 3 per brand |
| Named competitors tracked | 5 | 10 |
| Measurement refresh | daily, automatic | daily, automatic |
| Answer history kept | 6 months | 1 year |
| Community coverage | Reddit · Quora · X | Reddit · Quora · X |
| Drafted replies (in your voice, disclosure built in) | 60 credits/mo | 150 credits/mo |
| Guided posting pace | up to 10 replies/day | up to 20 replies/day |
| The full Monitoring suite (7 indexes · funnel · sources · sentiment · trends) | ✅ all of it | ✅ all of it |
| Reports: branded PDF + editable pivot table + CSV | ✅ | ✅ |
| The earning layer — live threads + human-approved drafts | ✅ included | ✅ included |
Dollar-for-dollar vs Temso — tier by tier
Temso publishes clean tiers (from their pricing page, 2026-07), so this one can be precise:
| Their plan | What it includes | The needlz answer | The math |
|---|---|---|---|
| $89/mo ($1,068/yr) | 3 AI models · 50 prompts · 5 content pieces/mo · 10K AI bot visits · 10K pages audited | Founder $29/mo ($348/yr) — 3 engines · 25 buyer questions · 5 competitors · full monitoring suite · 60 drafted replies/mo | $720/yr kept. You trade bot-visit analytics for the earning layer — measurement alone vs measurement + replies |
| $199/mo ($2,388/yr) | all models · 150 prompts · 10 content pieces · 25M bot visits · 100K pages | Agency $79/mo ($948/yr) — 4 engines · 50 questions & 3 markets per brand · 10 competitors · 150 drafts/mo; 3 brands ≈ $177/mo ($2,124/yr) | single-brand: $1,440/yr kept; even at 3 brands you're under their one-brand Growth price |
| $499/mo ($5,988/yr) | 350 prompts · 100M bot visits · 1M pages · dedicated manager | Agency at ~8 brands ≈ $422/mo ($5,064/yr) — 400 tracked questions across 8 brands, drafting on every one | still cheaper — and every brand gets the earning engine, not just an audit |
Where their dollars go: crawl volume (bot visits, pages audited) — genuinely valuable if your site is huge. Where ours go: buyer questions answered and citations earned — the number your CEO actually asks about.
- Needlz Founder is exactly a third of Temso's Starter ($29 vs $89) — and our Agency tier ($79) undercuts their entry plan while covering multiple brands.
- Their Growth at $199/mo ≈ $2,388/yr; a needlz Agency running 3 brands ≈ $2,124/yr — and includes the drafting/earning engine.
And to be fair the other way: if you need what Temso AI is uniquely great at (see above), their price may be entirely worth it. Different tools, different jobs — that's the honest version.
Who should pick which — honestly
- Pick Temso AI for what they're uniquely great at (above). It's real.
- Pick needlz if you want the measuring and the earning in one founder-priced tool.
- Plenty of teams would be well-served by both.
See where you stand
Run a free scan at needlz.ai — Founder $29/mo · Agency from $79/mo.
To the Temso team: great product, genuinely. See you on the leaderboards. — the needlz builders
